Long Overdue, Preliminary Thoughts on Traditionis Custodes

π΅π‘’π‘π‘Žπ‘’π‘ π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘ π‘œ π‘šπ‘Žπ‘›π‘¦ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘—π‘’π‘π‘‘π‘  π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ 𝐼 π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘™π‘‘ π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ 𝑔𝑒𝑑 π‘‘π‘œ π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘›π‘” 2020-2022, 𝐼 π‘€π‘Žπ‘  π‘›π‘œπ‘‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘™π‘’ π‘‘π‘œ π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘π‘’π‘π‘–π‘“π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘™π‘™π‘¦ π‘œπ‘› π‘‡π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘–π‘  πΆπ‘’π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘‘π‘’π‘ . 𝐼 β„Žπ‘Žπ‘£π‘’ π‘“π‘œπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘œπ‘šπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘π‘˜π‘’π‘‘π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘–π‘šπ‘’ π‘‘π‘œ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘‘π‘’π‘π‘’ π‘šπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘¦ π‘™π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘™π‘¦, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘œ π‘‘π‘œ π‘ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘ π‘œπ‘šπ‘’ π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘™π‘–π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘¦ π‘‘β„Žπ‘œπ‘’π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘  (π‘Žπ‘  π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 𝑖𝑠 π‘ π‘œ π‘šπ‘’π‘β„Ž π‘‘π‘œ π‘ π‘π‘’π‘Žπ‘˜ π‘Žπ‘π‘œπ‘’π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘’π‘›π‘”π‘Žπ‘”π‘’ π‘€π‘–π‘‘β„Ž) π‘œπ‘› π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘π‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘ π‘’π‘π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ πΏπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘› π‘€π‘Žπ‘ π‘ , 𝐼 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒 π‘¦π‘œπ‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘€:

The bare fact of forcing the Roman Missal of 1962 (aka TLM in use prior to the Novus Ordo) practically out of use is not something that I’m happy about. I have no dogmatic attachment to it, and I’ve made it clear that I am in support of reforms to it (some of them were attempted in the Missal of Paul VI). With that said, I must add that the current context wherein the Missal of 1962 is being suppressed as a matter of Papal law for the Roman rite gives enough clarity with which to deem the act reprehensible and disgusting. There are many reasons why.

In the first place, the 1962 Missal has been confirmed as part of the wood of the Catholic faith and should be given the liberty to flourish especially where it serves the good of the faithful in their pursuit of salvation. Taking from this, the liturgical praxis of the Roman rite with the usage of the Missal of Paul VI has, together with a combination of other things, been for the greater harm of the Church by certain means which are alien to itself.

What “other things”? The loss of orthodoxy, reverence towards God, solemnity of worship, and passionate evangelization (ironically, given Vatican II). There was also concurrent the active feminization of Catholic discipline (it wasn’t anywhere near perfect pre-V2) together with the practical (untheoretical) religious pluralism and indifference that resulted from a disordered enthusiasm for “other religions.” Unfortunately, the Missal of Paul VI was sown together with these combinations, and it is terribly difficult to see the Novus Ordo in its beautiful isolation. Though, a liturgical discipline doesn’t exist in isolation. Its inception was also combined with other elements, as they always are. Perhaps the “reverent” Novus Ordo that exists in some places (very rare) could eventually achieve the status of universality, but there is no evidence of that.

Though alien to the Missal itself, the combination of these things sown together with the Novus Ordo has caused many Catholics, especially the young men with families and the world of converts (both old and young), to be starving and thirsty for some strong branch of Catholicism upon which to establish a foundation for their familial walk with Christ as they seek to achieve heavenly glory. They don’t want to be entertained and treated like children who, metaphorically speaking, show their honor for Christ with spiritual version of crayons and finger paint. They want ardor, devotion, sacrifice, voluntary pain, and a sober participation in the cross-carrying life that Jesus demanded from the greatest and the least of His disciples. Consequently, these thirsty and starving Catholics, like a deer panting in the wild for the lack of water, have all rushed to the active celebration of the Mass in the TLM. We are past the point of needing proof of this.

Therefore, the nixing of the TLM puzzles the rational mind more than anything. We are told, and I’ve said, that there has been a schismatic mentality developing in the TLM world which, even if they aren’t aware of the consequences of many of their ideas, breeds evil in the minds and hearts of traditional Catholics. I haven’t seen this as the norm, but even if it were, I find that taking just 30 minutes to educate a trad on some points here and there quickly fixes some of their misunderstandings and alters the bad trajectories. But even if the presence of such a trend were to be significant enough to warrant the attention of the spiritual watchtower of the Vatican, the proposed solution of nixing the TLM still puzzles the mind. Why?

If one has been following what I’ve been saying, there is a much bigger pink elephant in the room that is being ignored in this violent suppression of the TLM, and that is the combination of factors that were sown together with the promulgation of the Novus Ordo. Instead of building an army against the TLM, an army should have been made for dealing with that problem first and foremost.

“Oh, but Erick. You don’t get it. The trads have now not just become reactionaries to the ‘liberal’ Novus Ordo’s. They have sought to prove that Church history, liturgical law, and a new sense of limiting the power of the magisterium grounds their opposition to the reforms of Paul VI!! Therefore, it has now become a internal battle over essential pillars of the Church itself! Thus, even a reverent Novus Ordo done in such a way that makes it nearly indistinguishable from the TLM (at least for novice eyes/ears) is still illegal!”

I get that. Such a phenomenon is unhelpful. However, I still don’t see this as the overwhelming majority of those who have wedded themselves to the TLM. It seems to be a smaller community within. But even so, let’s go ahead and grant this. Would it not have been better to attack the root of such misunderstandings, knowing that the root is the place that not only produced but keeps producing harm to the masses? I think this is obvious. Then, concurrent with this, you can then propose a way to confront those Catholics who have developed these robust “arguments” against the Church.

In fact, I think if Rome took 20 years, beginning full force at the get go, of cracking down on the psuedo orthodoxy, banality, irreverence, and feminization that has taken place and still takes place in the ordinary use of the Roman rite, such that immediate laws were instilled to prevent careless attacks against the faith (via practical lukewarmness), many of the TLM’ers would be able to salute the Pope and the hierarchy for making a due effort. Perhaps then the congregations and dicasteries of the Vatican would have some credibility in their forthright corrections to the radtrad myths on Church authority and whatever else (the recent statements of Bishop Athanasius Schneider are a case-in-point).

And here I don’t just mean general solutions being recommended. I mean enforced libelli which makes the commitment of every bishop, priest, and deacon a public vow to obey Christ and His Church, similar to the public subscription to the Syllabus of Errors, only this time with a long-lasting and keen monitor on implementation. If the Church has been at the inception of a mess (1960’s and following), or rather making a bigger mess from the already existing mess (1960’s and prior), it can afford the work at recuperating from it. I think this, while also giving a balanced support for the TLM to flourish where it is requested, would have gone a much longer way in gaining the hearts of the growing community of traditionalists (which aren’t very large anyway, and probably won’t be for a very long time).

But I am under no allusions. I know the latter won’t happen. And guess what? It is largely because the current administrations in Rome are still under the effects of the combinations that I described above in the first place! LOL. So, what we really have here is leadership that is formed and accepting of the problems that came with the breeze sent through the world in the 20th century by the prince of the powers of the air attempting to try and fix the problem that I have specifically outlined above. Aside from this, it is also just nearly impossible to instill worldwide reforms. But it is possible. Heck, it happens with the Novus Ordo and post-Vatican II Catholicism.

The crackdown on traditionalists from Rome also shows a curious method of parenting. There is this passionate desire to cleanse out from the Church the “schismatic” mentality of the trads as if the already existing structures (themselves alien to the Church’s official decrees) have not been combined with their own unhealthy doses of poison against the Catholic faith. And the solution is to outlaw and discipline the traditionalists. Maybe it is because I’m a Father and I have to deal with teen discipline, but harsh discipline that kills the life of your teen and leaves him without a wing is never a way to create an environment of reform. And if I were to do something like this while also giving mere “advice” to other teens in my house who were doing things equally worse as the one I punished, this would be something to be ashamed of as a Father.

Again, reprehensible and disgusting are the words that describe my feelings. And what comes close to this is seeing well-meaning Catholics trying to talk their fellow Catholics off the ledge towards leaving the Church by magnifying the “irrationality” of the traditionalists (of which I’ve commented on before), emphasizing the tiny good that can be, with a magnifying glass, seen coming from hierarchy, while then either ignoring or belittling the greater mistakes and destructive acts that come from Rome, ascertaining them as less harmful than schism/heresy in light of its being “mere imprudence.” This shows no respect for the sensitive nature of the human soul, and it attempts to use legal technicalities as a way to blind people from seeing a genuine problem that cannot be overlooked. If it was ever said that the “road to hell is paved with the bones of priests and monks, and the skulls of bishops are the lampposts that light the path,” it can also be said that the road to hell is paved with imprudence.

Lastly, since I am often criticized for not providing ready-made solutions with which people can be motivated to move forward from a set of paralyzing set of news, I recommend people to be very patient with any big decisions. If you work in the fields such as medicine, engineering, or finance (et. al.), you know that a crisis is not fixed by quick and easy reactions. Its the same in the spiritual life. It is important to keep the basics still in place. You have to continue to be holy, lest you be found unworthy when the Master returns at the hour you do not expect. That’s first. Though, people often need motivation even for this. One might gain a sense of stability by looking at alternatives to Catholicism. I encourage people to do that, depending on the stature of one’s faith. If one is confident in Catholicism, then being reassured that there is no place to go where one can evacuate having to give the same excuses for sticking around can often help in that it shows there is no need to be hasty with what you are to do. A decision that comes from a patient, calm, prayerful, educated, and anxiety-free disposition will always be better than one which comes from the opposites. Meanwhile, you can focus your time learning something deeply. For me, I benefit from Scripture studies and reading biographies of men and woman who lived through times that they thought were impossible to get through. Even if you must suffer in ways you can’t describe to others, you can find relief knowing that you have company in the vast history of the human family.

1 thought on “Long Overdue, Preliminary Thoughts on Traditionis Custodes

  1. As a Prot either way the Catholic church is proven to be pagan antichrist.

    If Francis is True Pope and can just ban the traditional liturgy, the office of pope is proven to be of Satan.

    If Francis is False Pope, then all popes back to 1958 were as well, and the papacy is proven to be a man-made antichrist institution that failed.

    If the New Mass is legit, Catholicism is of Satan because it is clownish (even featuring literal clowns) and disorganized (my Prot church doesn’t believe in transubstantiation but orderly distributed the bread on a plate without issues nonetheless where you profess to believe it and chuck the “host” like a baseball or shoot it out a t-shirt canon or hand it out like handing out fliers to passers by).

    If the New Mass is not legit and yhe Old Mass is, Catholicism is Satanic Mary worship and a black mass pretending to re-crucify Christ. (All masses are black masses.)

    Do no matter what, Catholics are going to hell; the disorder and idolatry they experience here is just a preview of the eternal confusion and separation from God.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s